The fluorescent light is humming, a low-frequency buzz that vibrates inside my molars, while the CEO keeps clapping. It is a rhythmic, hollow sound, like two pieces of dry driftwood hitting each other in an empty hall. He is standing at the front of the ‘All-Hands’ meeting, his face flushed with the kind of performative excitement that only people who don’t have to work weekends can afford. Behind him, a slide shows a stock photo of a mountain climber, and in bold, sans-serif font, the word ‘GRIT’ sits like an accusation. He calls it ‘amazing dedication.’ I call it a failure of leadership so profound it should be punishable by a mandatory 4-year sabbatical.
I’ve been thinking a lot about the word grit lately. It’s become the corporate catch-all for ‘please don’t notice that we are understaffed by 44 percent.’ As a librarian in a state correctional facility, my perspective on grit is perhaps a bit skewed compared to the average middle manager. In here, Thomas F.-that’s me-sees grit in the eyes of men who have survived 14 years of a system designed to erase them. That is grit. That is a personal survival mechanism. But when my corporate friends talk about it, they’re usually describing a scenario where they had to skip their daughter’s birthday because a project manager forgot to check a calendar. That’s not grit; that’s being a victim of someone else’s incompetence. Last week, I was so distracted by this paradox that I gave wrong directions to a tourist outside the main gate. I told them to head south for 4 miles to find the highway when they actually needed to go north. I realized it about 4 minutes after they drove off. I felt like a fraud, a man supposed to guide people through the stacks of knowledge but unable to point a car in the right direction. But maybe that’s the point. We are all so busy being ‘resilient’ that we’ve lost our sense of basic navigation.
[Grit is a virtue for the soul, but a vice for the balance sheet.]
Systemic Burden vs. Individual Failure
When we glorifying grit, we are effectively shifting the burden of systemic failure onto the individual’s nervous system. It’s a clever trick, really. If you burn out, it’s not because the workload was impossible; it’s because your ‘resilience’ wasn’t high enough. You didn’t meditate enough. You didn’t drink enough green juice. You didn’t have enough grit. It’s a way of pathologizing the employee instead of fixing the environment. I see this in the library all the time. The inmates are told to be ‘gritty’ about their rehabilitation, yet the vocational programs are cut by 34 percent and the books are 24 years out of date. We ask people to pull themselves up by their bootstraps while we are busy cutting the straps off the boots. It’s a cynical game of musical chairs where the music is played by a management team that owns all the chairs.
Vocational Program Cuts (34%)
34%
The Vest and The Voucher: Ownership vs. Exploitation
I remember a project back in my brief stint in the private sector, before I retreated to the relative sanity of the prison stacks. We were building a platform for a client who had a budget of exactly $10004 and a timeline that defied the laws of physics. My manager, a man who wore vests even in 84-degree heat, told us we needed to ‘dig deep.’ He spoke about grit as if it were a physical substance we could extract from our bone marrow. We worked 74-hour weeks. We lived on cold pizza and spite. When the project launched, 14 days late and riddled with 444 bugs, he got a bonus. We got a ‘shout-out’ in the company newsletter and a 4-dollar voucher for the coffee machine that was currently broken. That was the moment I realized that ‘ownership’ is just a way to get you to work for free, and ‘grit’ is just a way to get you to do it without complaining.
“
‘Ownership’ is just a way to get you to work for free, and ‘grit’ is just a way to get you to do it without complaining.
The Bridge Analogy: Engineering vs. Willpower
There is something deeply dishonest about using psychological traits to justify operational deficits. If a bridge collapses because it was built with 4 tons of steel instead of 14, we don’t blame the bridge for not having enough ‘resilience.’ We blame the engineers. We blame the budget. We blame the people who signed off on the blueprints. But in the modern workplace, we expect the human bridge to just ‘hold on’ through sheer force of will. It’s a toxic expectation. It creates a culture where being tired is a status symbol and asking for help is a confession of weakness. I’ve watched 4 of my best colleagues leave the profession because they were tired of being told that their exhaustion was a personal failing. They weren’t weak; they were just tired of being used as a buffer for bad planning.
Expected Structure
Individual Resilience
Digital Tether and Cognitive Load
In the world of digital interfaces and engagement, the pressure to be constantly ‘on’ is even worse. We are tethered to our screens by 4 different notification systems, each one demanding a piece of our attention. This is where places like ems89 come into the conversation, at least in my head. When I look at how we interact with technology, I see the same ‘grit’ trap. We are expected to navigate increasingly complex and predatory digital ecosystems with a smile, as if our cognitive load has no limit. But it does. There is a point where engagement becomes exploitation. Responsible digital platforms understand that the goal isn’t to drain the user of every last drop of ‘resilience,’ but to provide a space that respects human boundaries. We need more of that-systems that are built for humans, not for the ghosts of ‘grit’ that management likes to conjure up during quarterly reviews.
The Data Story: Maintenance vs. Mining
Let’s talk about the numbers for a second, because data is just a story with the skin peeled off. In a survey of 444 employees across 4 different industries, 84 percent reported that ‘resilience training’ was offered as a substitute for hiring more staff. That is a staggering statistic. It means that the vast majority of corporate ‘wellness’ initiatives are actually just camouflage. They are not trying to make you well; they are trying to make you more durable so they can run you longer. It’s the difference between maintenance and mining. A company that cares about your well-being maintains you. A company that glorifies grit is mining you. And eventually, every mine runs dry. I’ve seen it in the library. A man can only be ‘gritty’ for so long before his spirit turns to dust. I’ve had guys come in to return a book, and they just stand there for 4 minutes, staring at the spine, unable to remember why they came in. That’s the end-stage of grit. That’s the total depletion of the self.
Maintenance (16%)
Mining (84%)
The Trap of Complicity
I admit, I’m a hypocrite sometimes. I tell my library assistants to ‘hang in there’ when the budget gets slashed again. I tell them we can make it work with 4 fewer computers. I’m using the same language I despise because it’s the only language the system understands. It’s a trap. If I say ‘we can’t do this,’ I’m seen as a bad leader. If I say ‘we will find a way,’ I’m complicit in our own over-extension. It’s a 14-sided problem with no right answer. But the first step is at least naming the ghost. We have to stop calling it grit when it’s actually just misery. We have to stop applauding the ‘dedication’ of the person who hasn’t seen their family in 4 days and start asking why the project was so poorly scoped that such a sacrifice was necessary.
STOP CALLING IT GRIT
CALL IT MISERY
Losing Navigation
South
The Wrong Way
Busy Mind
Can’t See Map
North
The Way Out
Management is Obstacle Removal
Management isn’t about inspiring people to suffer; it’s about removing the obstacles that cause suffering. It’s about ensuring there are 14 people for a 14-person job, not 4 people for a 14-person job. It’s about realizing that ‘ownership’ means the company owns its mistakes, not that the employee owns the stress of those mistakes. Until we change the definition of a ‘successful’ team from ‘those who survived the crunch’ to ‘those who were never crunched in the first place,’ we are just spinning our wheels in the mud. And the mud doesn’t care how much grit you have. It just gets deeper.
14 / 14
The Required Ratio
The Final Victory: Staying Whole
Thomas F. is just a librarian. I don’t have the 4-step plan to revolutionize the global economy. I just have my stacks of books and my 44 shelves and my observations of the men who come through my door. But I know this: a virtue that is forced is no virtue at all. It’s just a requirement. And when grit becomes a requirement, it loses its soul. It becomes just another line item on a spreadsheet, another way to measure how much more they can take before you finally break. So the next time your boss claps for your ‘resilience,’ maybe don’t clap back. Just look at your watch, see that it’s 4:00 PM, and remember that you have a life that exists outside of their mountain-climber slides. Is that a radical act? Maybe. But in a world that wants to mine you for your marrow, staying whole is the only real victory. What happens if we all just stop being ‘gritty’ and start being human instead?